Carnivore Niche Partitioning in a Human Landscape
Mauriel Rodriguez Curras, Emiliano Donadio, Arthur D. Middleton, and Jonathan N. Pauli
Abstract
To minimize competitive overlap, carnivores modify one of their critical niche axes: space, time, or resources. However, we currently lack rules for how carnivore communities operate in human-dominated landscapes. We simultaneously quantified overlap in the critical niche axes of a simple carnivore community—an apex carnivore (Puma concolor), a dominant mesocarnivore (Lycalopex culpaeus), and a subordinate small carnivore (Lycalopex griseus)—in a human landscape featuring pastoralists and semidomestic carnivores (i.e., dogs, Canis familiaris). We found that dominant species had strong negative effects on the space use of subordinate ones, which ultimately created space for subordinate small carnivores. Humans and dogs were strictly diurnal, whereas the native carnivore community was nocturnal and exhibited high temporal overlap. Dietary overlap was high among the native carnivores, but dogs were trophically decoupled, largely because of human food subsidies. Our results show that in landscapes with evident human presence, temporal and dietary partitioning among native carnivores can be limited, leaving space as the most important axis to be partitioned among carnivores. We believe that these findings—the first to simultaneously assess all three critical niche axes among competing carnivores and humans and their associated species (i.e., domesticated carnivores)—are transferable to other carnivore communities in human-modified landscapes.
If you’re an author on this paper or just found it really interesting, consider writing a post telling us more about it! Contact Kristin for more details and to become a contributor.
Featured Image: Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, no rights reserved (CC0)
Catch up on recent urban eco-evo literature in the Literature section
Leave a Reply