Urbanization Reduces Genetic Connectivity in Bobcats

When you live in the outskirts of the city, every once in a while you may spot a bobcat in your neighborhood. In fact, we have had a few urban observation posts of neighborhood bobcats. But how are these urban bobcats fairing compared to ones that stay in their natural habitat?

Recently, Kozakiewicz and co-authors set out to find what landscape features influence bobcat genetic connectivity, with a special interest in urban landscapes. They sampled 271 bobcats across southern California and genotyped 13,520 SNPs to identify patterns of genetic connectivity.

Sampling of bobcats across Southern California. Colored maps show defined sub-populations with their spatial boundaries indicated as solid colored lines. Dark black lines are highways, which correlate to the spatial structuring of the 5 populations.

Across the broad scale sampling, urbanization (mostly highways/roads) was the strongest factor that reduced genetic connectivity, breaking apart the bobcat populations into 5 distinct subpopulations. Interestingly, within each of these 5 populations, there was also an effect of urbanization on genetic connectivity. For example, high impervious surface, which is highly correlated to the level of urbanization, restricted gene flow within two of the subpopulations. However, this effect was not also significant within populations, which suggests that there is spatial heterogeneity within these subpopulations that allows for gene flow between less urbanized patches.

Leave a Reply

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑

Skip to content
%d bloggers like this: