The public health implications of gentrification: tick-borne disease risks for communities of color
Samniqueka J. Halsey, Meredith C. VanAcker, Nyeema C. Harris, Kaleea R. Lewis, Lisette Perez, and Genee S. Smith.
Abstract
Gentrification operates as a social driver of health that can increase tick-borne disease (TBD) risk for communities of color through either population displacement or land-use change. Research on the emergence of TBDs in urban environments has primarily focused on the ecological processes of urban landscapes that facilitate favorable habitats for host reservoirs and tick vectors. However, neglecting to view infectious disease risk from a socioecological framework will continue to result in policies and planning that disadvantage communities of color. Using Lyme disease as a case study, we integrated elements of environmental epidemiology, ecology, public health, and urban planning to propose pathways of gentrification as a socioecological process with public health implications. By drawing connections between urban ecology, urban planning, and environmental racism, we seek to bring awareness to disease ecologists, policy makers, and public health managers on the potential role of gentrification as a driver of tickborne pathogen exposure.
If you’re an author on this paper or just found it really interesting, consider writing a post telling us more about it! Contact Kristin for more details and to become a contributor.
Featured image: Figure 1, Halsey et al. 2022.
- New Lit Alert: Urban-rural gradients: how landscape changes drive adaptive evolution of plant competitive traits - December 16, 2022
- New Lit Alert: The public health implications of gentrification: tick-borne disease risks for communities of color - August 24, 2022
- New Lit Alert: Temperature and not landscape composition shapes wild bee communities in an urban environment - August 18, 2022
Leave a Reply